Episode 3 Los Angeles (6/5/2017)
BachChat :: The Bachelor/Bachelorette/Paradise :: Past Bachelor/Bachelorette shows :: The Bachelorette 13 (Rachel Lindsay)
Page 1 of 1 • Share
Episode 3 Los Angeles (6/5/2017)
https://www.yahoo.com/tv/chris-harrison-blogs-bachelorette-week-3-160338463.html
Last edited by Bach98133 on Tue Jul 04, 2017 8:16 am; edited 3 times in total
_________________
The primary cause of unhappiness is never the situation but our thoughts about it. - Eckhart Tolle
Re: Episode 3 Los Angeles (6/5/2017)
Post #100 !
Nothing to add, just wanted to see if anything fun happens at the 100 milestone like balloons, ice cream, or strippers...
Nothing to add, just wanted to see if anything fun happens at the 100 milestone like balloons, ice cream, or strippers...
Moonbat- Posts : 132
Likes : 46
Join date : 2016-01-04
Re: Episode 3 Los Angeles (6/5/2017)
So glad the WhaBoom/Blake crap is over. I feared the producers would drag it on interminably thinking the viewers would love it. Lee is a true snake in the grass and hopefully goes next.
Rachel doesn't suffer fools gladly and cuts right to the heart of things. I admire that.
Damn it, today I went on Twitter forgetting I hadn't unfollowed RS. So - you guessed it, now I know the winner. I am kicking myself all around the block!
Rachel doesn't suffer fools gladly and cuts right to the heart of things. I admire that.
Damn it, today I went on Twitter forgetting I hadn't unfollowed RS. So - you guessed it, now I know the winner. I am kicking myself all around the block!
Lesallee- Power User
- Posts : 3996
Likes : 2016
Join date : 2015-07-26
Location : Edmonton, AB
Re: Episode 3 Los Angeles (6/5/2017)
Sorry about that, sis. I can't keep up with all the backstabbers this season.
But I do think Kenny is a sweetheart and I hope Rachel gives him a one on one.
I was disgusted to hear that Alex urinated in the pool? How old is he anyway?
But I do think Kenny is a sweetheart and I hope Rachel gives him a one on one.
I was disgusted to hear that Alex urinated in the pool? How old is he anyway?
Babs2147- Power User
- Posts : 1051
Likes : 644
Join date : 2015-07-27
Location : Northern NJ
Re: Episode 3 Los Angeles (6/5/2017)
I'm tired of Lee and his smirky face.
Glittersisgld- Power User
- Posts : 2893
Likes : 982
Join date : 2015-08-03
Re: Episode 3 Los Angeles (6/5/2017)
You could feel how awkward and annoyed Rachel felt sitting on the couch with Lucas. He was only there because the producers asked her to keep him a while for their manufactured "drama". She was so happy to give him and Blake the boot. The exchange between the 2 of them after they were dismissed was so idiotic that I laughed. WTH.
Rachel is no nonsense and I like it, I actually feel like she is 100% in this to find a really genuine man. I can't say that I feel that way about any of the guys though, except maybe Kenny. I like him, I hope they spark some chemistry.
And please get rid of the guy who can't pronounce "mouth". He said "my name is in your mouf" several times and it was cringe worthy. Ugh.
Rachel is no nonsense and I like it, I actually feel like she is 100% in this to find a really genuine man. I can't say that I feel that way about any of the guys though, except maybe Kenny. I like him, I hope they spark some chemistry.
And please get rid of the guy who can't pronounce "mouth". He said "my name is in your mouf" several times and it was cringe worthy. Ugh.
Dazz- Power User
- Posts : 338
Likes : 151
Join date : 2015-08-11
Re: Episode 3 Los Angeles (6/5/2017)
I don't know who RS says is the F1 because I don't read his spoilers, but I just saw an article onLesallee wrote:So glad the WhaBoom/Blake crap is over. I feared the producers would drag it on interminably thinking the viewers would love it. Lee is a true snake in the grass and hopefully goes next.
Rachel doesn't suffer fools gladly and cuts right to the heart of things. I admire that.
Damn it, today I went on Twitter forgetting I hadn't unfollowed RS. So - you guessed it, now I know the winner. I am kicking myself all around the block!
wetPaint that said RS is wrong and F1 is not who we heard it was before. I don't know if RS changed his spoiler or what this means. I hope he is wrong. People rely on his spoilers and they have been mostly correct. I would love to see him be wrong.
thisoldmule- Power User
- Posts : 809
Likes : 683
Join date : 2015-12-30
Re: Episode 3 Los Angeles (6/5/2017)
RS changed his prediction, mule. Said his source was wrong on the first pick. He seems pretty adamant about his revised FR guy. Still wish I hadn't seen it!
Lesallee- Power User
- Posts : 3996
Likes : 2016
Join date : 2015-07-26
Location : Edmonton, AB
Re: Episode 3 Los Angeles (6/5/2017)
Blake and Lucas were pretty funny throwing shade at each other when they were eliminated. Blake was hilarious. I don't know if that whole thing was a set up or not, but it did make me laugh. I'm guessing they will both be on BIP just to keep things lively.
thisoldmule- Power User
- Posts : 809
Likes : 683
Join date : 2015-12-30
Re: Episode 3 Los Angeles (6/5/2017)
Ok. Well I did hear who F1 is, but now I'm confused if I heard his first pick or the revised one. lolLesallee wrote:RS changed his prediction, mule. Said his source was wrong on the first pick. He seems pretty adamant about his revised FR guy. Still wish I hadn't seen it!
thisoldmule- Power User
- Posts : 809
Likes : 683
Join date : 2015-12-30
Re: Episode 3 Los Angeles (6/5/2017)
Good for Rachel for showing good judgement first in what she said when Demario showed up at the house and also in getting rid of both Lucas and Blake at the same time. I predicted she was gonna shut that nonsense down real fast. Both of them were being immature. And after they got eliminated that exchange between them in the driveway was even more so. Good riddance.
On the one on one date, not sure why the producers came up with riding horse into stores on Rodeo Drive. Kind of dumb. If they were gonna do that they should have put those bags on the horses that they could do their business in. I guess their running out of ideas. I guess the only reason the store owners allowed it was for free publicity.
I'm hoping this is the last time we're gonna see the other girls this season. Rachel is quite capable of doing this on her own. I guess they keep putting them on there to promote them for the next BIP. I know at least two of them are supposed to be on there but I'm suspecting now that more of them will be there too.
I prefer the original format of having a rose ceremony at the end of each episode. This tune in next week is getting old.
On the one on one date, not sure why the producers came up with riding horse into stores on Rodeo Drive. Kind of dumb. If they were gonna do that they should have put those bags on the horses that they could do their business in. I guess their running out of ideas. I guess the only reason the store owners allowed it was for free publicity.
I'm hoping this is the last time we're gonna see the other girls this season. Rachel is quite capable of doing this on her own. I guess they keep putting them on there to promote them for the next BIP. I know at least two of them are supposed to be on there but I'm suspecting now that more of them will be there too.
I prefer the original format of having a rose ceremony at the end of each episode. This tune in next week is getting old.
rkc1960- Power User
- Posts : 1325
Likes : 544
Join date : 2013-03-19
Re: Episode 3 Los Angeles (6/5/2017)
Those girls were brought on because they are going to be on BIP. It was like an ad for that show.
therealdfshary- Power User
- Posts : 30044
Likes : 867
Join date : 2015-09-22
Re: Episode 3 Los Angeles (6/5/2017)
The BIP cast is actually quite interesting... I really like some of the guys that will be on. I hope Vinny finds love =) He is my favorite.
Not thrilled to see Amanda really - she is like the new Clare or Ashley I.
Not thrilled to see Amanda really - she is like the new Clare or Ashley I.
Dazz- Power User
- Posts : 338
Likes : 151
Join date : 2015-08-11
Re: Episode 3 Los Angeles (6/5/2017)
I liked the first pick better. I'd pick him for my daughter. LOLthisoldmule wrote:Ok. Well I did hear who F1 is, but now I'm confused if I heard his first pick or the revised one. lolLesallee wrote:RS changed his prediction, mule. Said his source was wrong on the first pick. He seems pretty adamant about his revised FR guy. Still wish I hadn't seen it!
therealdfshary- Power User
- Posts : 30044
Likes : 867
Join date : 2015-09-22
Re: Episode 3 Los Angeles (6/5/2017)
I caved! I went and took a peak and I like the first one better too! However, if the prediction is accurate, he will be the next Bachelor anyway =)therealdfshary wrote:I liked the first pick better. I'd pick him for my daughter. LOLthisoldmule wrote:Ok. Well I did hear who F1 is, but now I'm confused if I heard his first pick or the revised one. lolLesallee wrote:RS changed his prediction, mule. Said his source was wrong on the first pick. He seems pretty adamant about his revised FR guy. Still wish I hadn't seen it!
Every year I say I want to be surprised, every year I look. Ugh.
Dazz- Power User
- Posts : 338
Likes : 151
Join date : 2015-08-11
Re: Episode 3 Los Angeles (6/5/2017)
Amanda isn't as devious as Clare or as talkative as Ashley. Amanda only agreed to be on BIP if Josh wasn't on the show.
Glittersisgld- Power User
- Posts : 2893
Likes : 982
Join date : 2015-08-03
Re: Episode 3 Los Angeles (6/5/2017)
I'm not into seeing the same people on BIP either, Dazz. Obviously the cast has to come from previous Bachelor/ette shows but once they are on BIP it ought to be a one time deal. It gets annoying to see the same ones over and over. As for Amanda, it was made public that her ex took her to court the last time over all that time she was spending on being on these shows and leaving their daughter to do it. Plus all the money she was making doing this and her subsequent endorsements and he was paying the same in support. I hope she thinks it's worth it. I just don't like hearing these people that leave their kids over and over again whining about missing their kids while doing it. SMH
Keepthefaith1960(rkc1960)- Guest
Re: Episode 3 Los Angeles (6/5/2017)
The way Rachel handled the DeMario situation was excellent. And I'm glad she let Lucas and Blake go rather early in the season. Apparently they have a history of being on a past reality show together. She didn't look like she was into that kiss from Fred, but did she really have to bring that rose when pulling Fred aside when she knew she was going to let him go? Even if a producer suggested it. Well anyhow, she's still been outstanding as a bachelorette.
I don't know who all the cast for BIP will be but I'm glad to hear at least bad boy Chad won't be on there again.
I don't know who all the cast for BIP will be but I'm glad to hear at least bad boy Chad won't be on there again.
skt8word- Power User
- Posts : 617
Likes : 298
Join date : 2015-07-31
Re: Episode 3 Los Angeles (6/5/2017)
DeMario will be on BIP. Also on BIP will be Kristina, the Russian girl with the sad story on Nick's season. I'm glad she will be on, because I liked her and she deserves to be on the show. She was interesting. Taylor and Corinne will be on the show, so we'll see if they continue their feud.
Glittersisgld- Power User
- Posts : 2893
Likes : 982
Join date : 2015-08-03
Re: Episode 3 Los Angeles (6/5/2017)
That's good to hear about Kristina. I'm glad she will be on to get a second chance. I wouldn't mind seeing Taylor or Corinne separately, but when they're together -- well, I hope they don't continue the same feud, but I expect them to clash.
skt8word- Power User
- Posts : 617
Likes : 298
Join date : 2015-07-31
Re: Episode 3 Los Angeles (6/5/2017)
I read a news article title that said 4 of the ladies on BIP cast have boyfriends... Really? Why bother then!
Dazz- Power User
- Posts : 338
Likes : 151
Join date : 2015-08-11
Re: Episode 3 Los Angeles (6/5/2017)
Four have boyfriends? Are they that desperate to get their mugs on tv again? That's so disrespectful...not only to their boyfriends but to the unsuspecting person they try to hook up with on this show....not to mention the viewing audience that is wasting their time watching! Idiots!
rkc1960- Power User
- Posts : 1325
Likes : 544
Join date : 2013-03-19
Re: Episode 3 Los Angeles (6/5/2017)
What is the source of the news article? It could not be true or maybe they already left the show.
Glittersisgld- Power User
- Posts : 2893
Likes : 982
Join date : 2015-08-03
Re: Episode 3 Los Angeles (6/5/2017)
Glittersisgld wrote: Also on BIP will be Kristina, the Russian girl with the sad story on Nick's season. I'm glad she will be on,
I'm glad she's on because she's smoking hot and I wanna pound her like a Veal Cutlet.
Feces.Hurling.Monkey- Power User
- Posts : 857
Likes : 184
Join date : 2015-08-11
Re: Episode 3 Los Angeles (6/5/2017)
therealdfshary wrote:Those girls were brought on because they are going to be on BIP. It was like an ad for that show.
Did Raven get Boob Implants, because they looked bigger than I remember. Maybe they're supposed to distract from her bulging forehead. Remember she told Nick her ex-BF never gave her an Orgasm?
Feces.Hurling.Monkey- Power User
- Posts : 857
Likes : 184
Join date : 2015-08-11
Similar topics
» Episode 5 Norway (6/26/2017); Episode 6 Denmark (6/27/2017)
» Episode 7 Switzerland (7/10/2017) (7/3/2017 is rerun of Episode 5)
» Episode 8 Hometowns (7/17/2017); Episode 9 Spain (7/24/2017)
» Episode 4 South Carolina (Scheduled for 6/12/2017 but delayed to 6/19/2017 due to NBA Finals)
» Episode 2: Malibu (5/29/2017)
» Episode 7 Switzerland (7/10/2017) (7/3/2017 is rerun of Episode 5)
» Episode 8 Hometowns (7/17/2017); Episode 9 Spain (7/24/2017)
» Episode 4 South Carolina (Scheduled for 6/12/2017 but delayed to 6/19/2017 due to NBA Finals)
» Episode 2: Malibu (5/29/2017)
BachChat :: The Bachelor/Bachelorette/Paradise :: Past Bachelor/Bachelorette shows :: The Bachelorette 13 (Rachel Lindsay)
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
|
|